Canada Supreme

Find Canada Supreme @ Amazon.com

In British Columbia there are 3 main types of criminal offences. They are (1) strictly summary conviction offences, (2) strictly indictable offences, and (3) hybrid offences.

These 3 types of offences are set out in the Criminal Code of Canada.

Purely summary conviction offences

The list of summary conviction offences is set out in section 553 of the Criminal Code. These are the most minor charges equated to indictable and hybrid offences. Examples include theft (under $5,000) and mischief charges.

Purely indictable offences

Indictable offences are the most severe criminal offences. These offences are set out in division 469 of the Criminal Code. Examples of indictable offences include murder and treason.

Hybrid offences

Hybrid offences are all those not listed in either division 553 or 469 of the Criminal Code. The majority of criminal offences in Canada are hybrid.

What hybrid offence means is the prosecutor may choose whether to classify an offence as summary conviction or indictable. How a charge is classified determines how a charge is processed through the criminal court system.

Process: summary conviction vs. indictable

The two main deviations are (1) the greatest or most complete or best possible punishments, and (2) the court process.

When the prosecutor has the option to choose (i.e. hybrid offence), the summary conviction greatest or most complete or best possible punishments are often times less severe than indictable classification.

For example, an impaired driving charge (aka operating while impaired) is a hybrid offence where the prosecutor may choose to carry on summarily or by indictment. As an indictable offence, the greatest or most complete or best possible punishment is 5 years in jail; as a summary conviction offence, the greatest or most complete or best possible punishment is 18 months.

Another divergence is the court process.

In British Columbia, criminal cases are processed and heard provincial courts and supreme courts. All tryouts in Provincial Court are heard by judge alone, whereas tryouts in Supreme Court may be heard by a judge alone or judge and jury.

Purely summary conviction offences (those listed in section 553 in the Criminal Code) are processed and heard only in Provincial Court. This means that an accused doesn’t have the option for a jury or a preliminary inquiry.

If a charge is a hybrid offence, and the prosecutor classifies it as indictable, then the accused may choose whether to have the case processed and heard in Provincial Court or Supreme Court.

The main divergence with Supreme Court is the option for a jury and preliminary inquiry (a pre-trial hearing where the prosecutor presents proof to the court to determine whether there is sufficient proof to carry on versus the accused).

If the prosecutor chooses to classify and proceed by indictment (i.e. indictable offence), then the accused chooses whether to have the case heard in Provincial Court or in Supreme Court by judge alone or judge and jury.

Purely indictable offences (those listed in division 469 of the Criminal Code) are processed and heard only in Supreme Court. The default trial mode is judge and jury; however, if the accused and prosecutor consent, the trial may be heard by judge alone.

That sets out the 3 types of criminal offences in British Columbia.


Canada Supreme

The Supreme Court of Canada decision in the Marshall case asserted sweeping Native treaty rights and generated intense controversy. In Power without Law Alex Cameron enlivens the debate over judicial activism with an unexampled examination of the details of the Marshall case, analyzing the proof and procedure in the trial court and tracing the legal arguments through the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. He argues that there were critical defects in the procedure – the successful argument at the Supreme Court of Canada was never tested in the lower courts, the Crown’s expert was precluded from testifying regarding a critical document, the Court’s analysis does not accord with the historical evidence, and the treaty rights are inconsistent with the colonial law of Nova Scotia. Concluding that the Marshall decision was the result of incautious judicial activism, Power without Law challenges us to reconsider the role of our courts in the Charter era.

Review

“Cameron’s book is in particular powerful in showing how this one decision has had monstrous ripple effects that are being felt allround the Maritime provinces to this day. He takes his reader through the stimulating odyssey of native claims, proving that nonfiction is at times more thrilling than fiction.” Frederick Vaughan, University of Guelph
Canada Supreme

Canada Supreme Pic

Canada Supreme

Canada Supreme Picture

Canada Supreme

Canada Supreme Photo

Canada Supreme

Canada Supreme Picture

Canada Supreme

Canada Supreme Image

Canada Supreme

Canada Supreme Picture

This entry was posted in Incidental And Program Music, Theatrical and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply